Following its Vol. 2 show premiere, Rihanna’s lingerie label received backlash for including a Coucou Chloe song that samples recordings of sacred Islamic texts, bringing appropriation in fashion and music to the forefront

Rihanna&#39;s <a href="https://www.lofficielsingapore.com/Culture/top-moments-from-rihanna-s-savage-x-fenty-sophomore-fashion-show">Savage x Fenty Vol. 2&nbsp;show</a> made headlines twice last&nbsp;week. First, major publications and social media users praised Savage x Fenty&rsquo;s inclusivity, with models of all shapes, races&nbsp;and gender identities featured in the spectacle of fashion, music&nbsp;and dance. But then, viewers&nbsp;realised that one song by Coucou Chloe in the show&rsquo;s soundtrack sampled a reading of a sacred Islamic religious text called a Hadith, bringing criticism to the brand.&nbsp;

Appropriation is a hot topic in regards to many art forms. At the intersection of fashion and music, designers have an opportunity to amplify their creative messages. For example, Celine&#39;s Hedi Slimane releases curated Spotify playlists with each runway, and <a href="https://www.lofficielsingapore.com/fashion/ones-to-watch-rising-designers-worth-keeping-an-eye-on">Pyer Moss&#39;&nbsp;Kerby Jean-Raymond</a> has dedicated an entire show to the legacy of music icon Sister Rosetta Tharpe.

There&rsquo;s often a great deal of consideration that goes into bringing together the multimedia elements of fashion shows, which are highly choreographed and planned. Lights, music&nbsp;and staging define these presentations, and Savage x Fenty&rsquo;s oversight reveals a lack of accountability in event coordination&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;the playlist had clearly not been reviewed for culturally inappropriate material.

The song in question, &#39;Doom&#39; by Coucou Chloe, was played as rapper Rico Nasty took the Savage x Fenty stage. Viewers on Twitter were quick to call the song out for being disrespectful. One Twitter user noted that when Savage x Fenty presents Islamic traditions for the sake of the brand&rsquo;s aesthetic &mdash; like a remix of a Hadith or the headscarves at the very first Savage x Fenty show &mdash; it doesn&rsquo;t benefit the communities from which it was appropriated.

3.jpeg

Rihanna took to her Instagram Stories to apologise,&nbsp;calling the song&rsquo;s inclusion an &ldquo;honest, yet careless mistake&rdquo;. The singer then thanked her Muslim fans for bringing the error to light, and promised to ensure that &ldquo;nothing like this ever happens again&rdquo;. Coucou Chloe also posted an apology on&nbsp;social media, saying that she claims &ldquo;full responsibility for the fact I did not research these words properly&quot;.&nbsp;Additionally, the artist said that &#39;Doom&#39; would be removed from all streaming platforms.

1.jpg

&#39;Doom&#39; was likely selected for its&nbsp;electronic elements and not its&nbsp;lyrics. Coucou Chloe herself selected the Hadith for&nbsp;its sonic content, writing on Twitter to explain that she had pulled vocal samples found online.&nbsp;

Sadly, such behaviour is an industry standard. We live in an era where curation is itself considered an art form. Whole documentaries are made from archival material. Remixes of songs often become more popular than the original tracks. Popular content creators on apps like <a href="https://www.lofficielsingapore.com/Culture/the-definitive-guide-to-tiktok-accounts-you-should-be-following-in-2020">TikTok</a> take and tweak formulas with the same sounds and same choreography. Coucou Chloe took free tracks from the internet and mixed them with her own sounds to create a unique song. In doing so, she used the work of others like building blocks to create her own artistic vision.&nbsp;

2.jpg

However, it is impossible to strip religious or cultural artefacts of their true meaning. Even with new beats, a Hadith is still a Hadith, and Coucou Chloe still (mis)used a sacred text in her song.

While the internet makes it easy for creators to obtain and incorporate work seen as fair use, it is nevertheless&nbsp;the responsibility of&nbsp;brands and artists to thoroughly vet and properly credit their sources. Rihanna&#39;s lingerie label&nbsp;has a track record of being inclusive and of celebrating diverse communities, and this&nbsp;controversy highlights that issues of appropriation and representation cannot be taken for granted.

What Rihanna's Savage X Fenty Controversy Says About The Fashion Industry

Related Articles

Hommes

Rihanna is Releasing a Men's Collection — and It's Not What You Think

Culture

How Much Money Does Rihanna Make From Her Fashion Empire?

Culture

From Demi Moore To Lizzo, Top Moments from Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty Sophomore Fashion Show

Recommended posts for you

Living

Dior's Cannage Decorates Le Noël de Monsieur Dior Tableware Collection

Culture

10 Exciting Korean TV Series to Look Out For in 2025 on Disney+

Culture

Season 2 of Hit Korean Series, 'Moving' is Officially Confirmed!

Culture

'Wicked' Brings the Magic of Oz to the Big Screen

Fashion

A Fashion Breakdown of BTS Jin’s ‘Running Wild’ Music Video

Watches & Jewellery

Han So-hee, Alexa Chung and More Front Boucheron's 'Gates of Wonders' Campaign

Living

Discovering Switzerland: Enriching Experiences Beyond the Classroom

Watches & Jewellery

Van Cleef & Arpels' Latest High Jewellery Collection is a Treasure Trove